Hernia mesh lawsuits allege that the mesh devices are defective and that hernia mesh makers failed to warn patients about potential adverse side effects. Some of the medical device makers that have faced lawsuits include Atrium, Bard Davol, and Ethicon.
Hernia mesh injuries alleged in lawsuits include:
Such complications may require additional hernia surgery to resolve. If you or someone you love has suffered from these or other hernia mesh injuries, you may be able to file a lawsuit and pursue compensation.
If you or a loved one suffered complications after a hernia mesh device was used to repair a hernia, you may qualify to join a hernia mesh lawsuit.
A hernia mesh lawsuit may help you obtain compensation for the following:
Fill out the short form on this page to see if you qualify for a free case evaluation.
Hernias occur when there is a weakness or hole in a muscle or connective tissue, allowing organs, intestines, or tissue to squeeze through the openings and become trapped. This usually results in a bulge that may be visible externally. Hernias can be caused by weakened muscles that have either been present since birth, or are linked with factors like age and repeated strains on the abdominal and groin areas, such as through physical exertion, obesity, pregnancy and frequent coughing. In some cases, hernias are repaired by sewing the muscle walls around the hole directly together. In other cases, a hernia mesh is used to repair the hole.
Hernia mesh is a medical device made of plastic or metal mesh that is placed in the hernia. It strengthens the weakened area and prevents internal organs and tissues from protruding through the hernia causing pain or medical complication.
Dr. Andrew T. Bates of Stonybrook Medicine discusses the benefits and risks of using hernia mesh in hernia repair. He explains that the devices grew in popularity after research indicated that there was a lower instance of hernia reappearance in instances in which hernia mesh was used, in comparison to those repairs in which no mesh was used. In the case of some types of hernias, the use of mesh dropped the rate of recurrence from 25 – 50% to under 5%. While hernia mesh does often decrease a patient’s risk of having their hernia reappear, use of the device comes with its own set of complications. The implantation of any medical device into the human body comes with risks. However, some particular risks of hernia mesh have both patients and doctors discussing the efficacy of the devices.
Hernia mesh complications can come in a number of forms. Broadly, they can be caused by:
Hernia mesh complications may be caused by defects with hernia repair mesh products, entitling consumers to take legal action.
Generally speaking, hernia mesh products may be defective because they were placed on the market despite manufacturers being aware of the following concerns:
Although hernia mesh products are widely used to repair hernias, these products may be associated with serious complications . Some of these complications may include:
Up to 170,000 British patients may be experiencing hernia mesh complications if they underwent hernia repair surgery in 2012 or later, according to a study published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ).
Patients who had had hernia mesh operations talked about “being in constant pain, unable to sleep, and finding it difficult to walk or even pick up a sock. Some patients said that they felt suicidal,” the BMJ reports.
Complications caused by hernia mesh can be detrimental to a patient’s quality of life, but relief may be possible. The rejected product can be removed surgically and compensation may be available if consumers take legal action against hernia mesh manufacturers.
A hernia can occur in a variety of locations in the body, which changes what type of hernia it is. Hernia types include:
The Physiomesh Flexible Composite Mesh device was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March 2010, through the federal agency’s 510k fast-track approval program. This program allows medical device makers to pursue approval of a product by showing that it is “substantially equivalent” to a similar product, without the standard requirements such as testing and research.
The Physiomesh hernia patch is described by Ethicon as a “sterile, low profile, flexible composite mesh designed for the repair of hernias and other fascial deficiencies.” It is made with a macroporous polypropylene that is held together by two undyed polygelcaprone-25 films.
After its approval, the Physiomesh quickly became a widely used hernia surgery mesh. However, it also became associated with more hernia mesh problems than expected after Ethicon’s hernia mesh product was used for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Complications reported include hernia recurrence, removal surgery, infections, wound problems, and abdominal pain.
This high rate of hernia mesh failure led Ethicon to remove the product from the market. In a May 2016 announcement, the removal of Ethicon’s Physiomesh Flexible Composite mesh was categorized as a “Market Withdrawal” and not a recall on the product itself.
Ethicon allegedly failed to clearly define the factors behind the high hernia mesh failure rate. Ethicon said that the failure rate could be due to several factors: design, the physician’s instructions, and patient selection.
Several hernia mesh repair lawsuits have been filed over failed Physiomesh hernia mesh products with some of the following allegations:
If you underwent hernia surgery and suffered side effects, your complications may be the result of a defective mesh product made by one of the four main hernia mesh manufacturers: Ethicon, C.R. Bard, Covidien , and Atrium.
Each of these manufacturers has multiple models of hernia mesh products. The following list includes some of the hernia mesh products from each manufacturer:
If you have been injured from hernia mesh failure, you may be entitled to file a hernia mesh repair lawsuit and receive damages for:
You may qualify to seek compensation for your injuries through a hernia mesh repair lawsuit.
Please fill out the form on this page to see if you qualify for a free case evaluation.
If you qualify, an attorney will contact you to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
Counsel responsible for this advertisement includes:
LegaFi Law LLC www.legafi.com, 888-4-LegaFi
Levin Papantonio Rafferty Proctor Buchanan O’Brien Barr Mougey, P.A. www.levinlaw.com, 800-277-1193
PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: THIS WEB PAGE IS AN ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEY(S) ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE.
Top Class Actions is not a law firm, lawyer referral service, or prepaid legal services plan. We do not endorse or recommend any third-party claims processing company, lawyer, or law firm who participates in the network. We do not make any representation, and have not made any judgment, as to the qualifications, expertise, or credentials of any participating lawyer or processing group. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services or claims processing to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services or claims processing performed by other lawyers or claims processing group. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Top Class Actions does not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege because Top Class Actions is not a law firm. Instead, your information will be forwarded to an attorney(s) or claims processing firm for the purpose of a confidential review and potential representation if you qualify. You will only be contacted by an attorney in response to your inquiry if your initial information appears to qualify you for representation. If you are not contacted by an attorney within one week, you should consult another firm since all legal claims are subject to filing deadlines. All photos contained on this website are of models and do not depict clients.
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
This site provides information about the law and lawsuits and is designed to help users safely cope with their own legal needs. Legal information is NOT the same as legal advice - the application of law to an individual's specific circumstances. Although we go to great lengths to make sure our information is accurate and useful, we recommend you consult a lawyer if you want professional assurance that our information, and your interpretation of it, is appropriate to your particular situation. You should consider all postings or writings at TopClassActions.com by staff or others as personal opinion only and NOT the advice of a lawyer. Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2022 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.
Get Your Hernia Mesh Repair Lawsuit Case Evaluated by Top Attorneys. Did you suffer from hernia mesh complications? You may be entitled to join a lawsuit.... Read More
© 2022 Top Class Actions LLC. All right reserved. | Legal Notice | Contact Us